Head to toe advocacy: How clothes fit into a litigation strategy

Litigation Daily

I’ve watched a lot of arguments in my time covering litigation, which means I’ve seen a lot of lawyers wearing essentially the same thing in the courtroom.

The overwhelming majority of the time, those outfits include a white shirt and a black, navy or charcoal suit. I’ve always wondered about what’s behind that near-uniform. Is it one of those things attorneys just do because that’s what their mentors did? Is it to keep one element simple during an otherwise complex event? And are litigators who deviate from that formula doing so to make a statement?

I asked litigators what they consider when getting dressed for court. More than anything else, those who do go for the white shirt and dark suit said they do so because they want to avoid anything that might distract from what they’re saying.

Continue reading here.

‘Opportunity for protection’: What to expect in Delaware corporate litigation in 2026

Delaware Business Court Insider

In 2026, Delaware’s corporate bar is expecting to see the continuation of several litigation trends that gained momentum in 2025.

Litigators are also looking to the courts to offer clarification on how changes adopted in 2025 to the Delaware General Corporation Law will apply in practice.

Continue reading here.

‘Clearway,’ safe harbors and constitutionality: A look back at the bill that split the Delaware bar

Delaware Business Court Insider

When asked about the most significant development in corporate law in 2025, attorneys who practice in Delaware—litigators on both sides and transactional lawyers alike—all refer back to Senate Bill 21, the changes it made to the Delaware General Corporation Law, and the questions about its constitutionality that are pending before the Supreme Court.

Discussion over those amendments has been ongoing throughout nearly the entire year. Senate Bill 21 was introduced in mid-February, immediately sparking a discussion over whether the legislation gave parameters for controller-involved transactions that offered needed clarity or if those parameters overstepped into the Delaware courts’ jurisdiction, as well as whether SB 21 was a necessary measure to protect Delaware’s corporate franchise and the lawyers who work within it.

Continue reading here.

Here’s what corporate governance lawyers want from a decision on Elon Musk’s Tesla compensation appeal

Litigation Daily

It’s finally happening: the big one.

That’s what I’ve had countless litigators and transactional lawyers alike call the appeal of Elon Musk’s compensation case in Delaware when I ask them what cases they’re watching closely. As in, “Well, of course, the big one is Tornetta v. Musk.”

The Delaware Supreme Court will hear argument on the big one today, and after more than six years, all that’s left is for the court to write what’s likely to be one big opinion.

Continue reading here.

To litigate or legislate? The Texas approach to building corporate law

Litigation Daily

When I started thinking about what to write about the one-year anniversary of Texas launching its business courts, two things struck me.

One, despite knowing what’s going on in Texas now being a sizable chunk of my job, I’ve never actually been there (unless you count the time American Airlines changed my flight schedule to include a some-expenses-paid overnight layover in a hotel just outside DFW).

Two, I can’t help but compare the conversation about how Texas’ legislature interacts with its business courts to what we’ve seen and heard this year out of Delaware. The central question in both venues is how much say legislators should have in shaping business law, and how much should be left to the courts.

Continue reading here.

Texas updated its business code. Here’s what corporate litigators still want to know.

Law.com

Since the Texas Legislature established new business courts, attorneys with an eye on corporate governance litigation have sought more information about how those courts might differ from or align with Delaware’s Court of Chancery and other states when it comes to an array of issues including procedure and standing.

While some answers have come from the bench in the first 10 months of the business courts’ operation, more questions were answered this year in the form of Texas Senate Bill 29, which delineated several ways corporate litigation in Texas compares to litigation in other jurisdictions.

Continue reading here.

Foot fault? Del. courts weigh when harm from corporate bylaws is beyond theoretical

Litigation Daily

Imagine you’re playing tennis. You’re about to serve, but the line judge stops you. You stepped over the baseline before you hit the ball. There’s a small but persistent group of people who travel from one tennis match to another, focused solely on trying to catch people making that same misstep and getting officials to make a call penalizing them for it.

Maybe you and some others are critical of that small group and believe they’re making a big deal out of a harmless error. But it could be argued that a harmless error still breaks the rules, and maybe that small group is doing something good by trying to catch them.

Continue reading here.

A brief history behind DExit and the biggest beef in Del. corporate law

Litigation Daily

When I’m not covering corporate litigation, one of my guilty pleasures is watching reality television shows on Bravo.

Now that Tom Girardi is done with both, corporate litigation and Bravo don’t typically have much overlap. But in the past two months, the public feuding I’ve seen both during legislative hearings and online has been more dramatic than anything I’m expecting from the “Vanderpump Rules” recasting.

Continue reading here.

‘Conversations are happening:’ clients haven’t stopped asking their attorneys whether Delaware is their best option for incorporation

Delaware Business Court Insider

Delaware’s newly-enacted changes to its corporate code were designed to keep the state attractive to corporations and keep the revenue they bring to state coffers.

In the first weeks following the passage of Senate Bill 21, litigators and transactional attorneys are still having the same conversations with their clients weighing the pros and cons of incorporating in Delaware as opposed to emerging jurisdictions like Texas or Nevada, each of which have been taking actions of their own to attract corporations in recent months.

Continue reading here.

Do sharpened definitions in Delaware’s corporate law amendments afford a ‘clear playbook’ or place Chancery in ‘straitjacket’?

Delaware Business Court Insider

Much of the debate about Delaware Senate Bill 21 stems from proposed amendments to Section 144 of the DGCL, including more concrete parameters for who qualifies as a controlling shareholder, what makes a director independent and how a deal can be shielded from the entire fairness standard.

Supporters of SB 21, which has been passed by the Senate and is scheduled to go before the House Judiciary Committee this week, say the so-called safe harbor procedures outlined in the legislation would give corporations clarity on how to properly proceed with a transaction and ultimately cut down on the number of transactions challenged in the Court of Chancery.

Continue reading here.